Evaluate the following article; discuss the research methodology and Assignment

Evaluate the following article; discuss the research methodology and implications for research in homeopathy - Assignment Example lbum 200, which are both collectively referred to as â€Å"verum† in the study, actually proved to be therapeutic only when â€Å"the volunteers [from the observed situation] were advised strictly to take arsenic-free water during the course of investigation† (Belon et al. 2007, p. 142). This therefore means that â€Å"some doubt was expressed as to whether the improvement noticed was actually due to their intake of the arsenic-free drinking water or†¦the homeopathic remedies† (Belon et al., p. 142). The study being analyzed right now was based on this idea that is why the 2007 study did not try to use any arsenic-free water for the purpose of avoiding the same confusion as the first studies that used such homeopathic remedies. However, the constant use of arsenic-contaminated water may have actually interfered with the expected results of the study since the subjects kept on taking arsenic-contaminated water at the same time that they were taking homeopathi c remedies. Thus, there could have been a sort of constant progression of the diseases brought about by arsenic contamination at the same time that the individual is being treated using homeopathic remedies. The efficiency of the remedy could have therefore been affected by the continuous supply of the cause of the disease. Furthermore, since the arsenic levels in every individual is not accounted for or that there is no way they could possibly be accounted for, then the study is therefore not entirely controlled. Some individuals may obviously be receiving relatively more arsenic levels than others, thus the effects of the homeopathic remedies on them may be different. In fact, this could have been the reason for the withdrawal of many of the respondents from the study who claimed that they did not experience ameliorating changes in them. Another problem with the research investigation was that 39 subjects of 20 males and 19 females may not have been enough as a particular sample size to represent the whole